Learn Electric Cars

Featured

The featured section of Learn Electric Cars contains all those posts which are created by the editorial team along with their opinions and views.

Electrify America Charging Network in the USA

Electrify America Leads Non-Tesla DC Fast Charging Network with 800 Stations

Electrify America charging network is the largest non-Tesla DC fast charging network in the USA. However, the greater concern is that only 13% of the public charging network in the USA is DC fast charging. The rest is Level 2 AC fast charging which takes hours to juice up the EV batteries. To be honest, highway and public charging stations must support DC fast charging because that is what the highway users need. They charge their electric cars using the slow, Level 1 and Level 2 chargers at home or parking lot of the office along with public places like shopping malls, food courts, etc. Despite the Government’s promise of rapidly developing the charging infrastructure across various states in the USA, the focus must be on installing DC chargers rather than Level 2 chargers which is the case at the moment. You may also like: Are Electric Car Chargers Universal – Types of Chargers EV Charging Network in the USA According to the data from the US Department of Energy, there are around 50,000 charging stations in the USA with 130,000 charging ports. Out of these, around 44,000 are Level 2 charging stations with over 100,000 charging ports. These have much slower charging capabilities compared to DC fast chargers. The number of DC fast charging stations out of the total is just 6,600 with around 28,000 charging ports. Interestingly, ChargePoint is the largest public charging network provider with about 27,000 charging stations and 50,000 charging ports out of the total 50,000. Most of these are Level 2. Then there is Tesla with around 6,000 stations and 28,000 charging ports followed by around 8,500 non-networked EV charging stations with almost 18,000 charging points. You may also like: Nio EC7 Has a CLTC Range of 920 km – Specs & More Electrify America Leads Non-Tesla DC Charging Network Race Electrify America is owned by the German auto giant, Volkswagen (VW). As per the US Department of Energy, Electrify America has about 800 DC fast charging stations with 3,600 fast-charging ports in the US. It is second to the proprietary 1,600 Supercharging stations by Tesla with 17,000 fast-charging ports. Note that in order to connect a non-Tesla EV to its charger, an additional connector is needed. However, currently, in North America, only Tesla vehicles can access the Supercharger network but the plan is to open it up to other EVs in the near future. Apart from these two prominent players in the DC charging network, EVgo also boats a decent 2,200 charging ports, while ChargePoint has about 1,800 DC fast-charging ports in the country. You may also like: 2023 Kia Niro EV Wind vs Wave – Price & Features Comparison Charging Network Speeds – Electrify America, Tesla, EVgo & ChargePoint Electrify America offers DC fast charging rates of up to 350 kW and its dense network allows non-Tesla EVs to go on a road trip almost anywhere in the country. Ford has partnered with Electrify America and every Mustang Mach-E owner gets 250 kWh of free DC fast charging at these charging stations. Tesla also offers charging speeds upto 250 kW at the Supercharging stations. Tennessee-based EVgo offers charging speeds ranging from 100 kW to 350 kW and General Motors (GM) has secured a deal with EVgo to install over 2,700 DC fast charging stations by 2025. It will have an average of 4 charging ports per station. Finally, the California-based ChargePoint has around 1,700 DC fast charging ports. Other notable players in the space include Shell-owned Greenlots (around 550 DC fast charging ports), Francis Energy (around 530 DC fast charging ports), EVConnect, EVCS and Blink, each with less than 250 DC Fast Charging ports. The Biden government is investing $5 billion over the next 5 years to enhance the national EV charging network in the country. Moreover, the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program offers over $1.5 billion in funding for states to construct EV charging networks.

Mercedes VISION EQXX

Factors on Which Energy Consumption of an EV Depends

With electric mobility taking its roots as the future solution, it becomes critical to acquaint ourselves with the factors on which the energy consumption of an EV depends. Now, everyone is concerned about the range of electric cars which is also the last remaining major issue with electric mobility in conjunction with charging infrastructure. But it looks like if EVs start offering really high range, people might get encouraged to take the plunge. For this blog post, we shall take into account the incredible feat achieved by the Mercedes VISION EQXX, where it was able to travel over 1,200 km on a single charge with an impressive energy consumption of just 8.3 kWh per 100 km. It completed this journey of 1,202 km from Stuttgart (Germany) to Silverstone (UK) in 14 hours and 30 minutes. You might also like: GAC Aion Hyper GT to be the Most Efficient Production Car Ever Key Figures for this Journey Value Distance Travelled 1,202 km Time Taken (over two days) 14 hours 30 minutes Drag Coefficient (Cd) 0.17 Energy Consumption 8.3 kWh per 100 km Weight (unladen) 1,755 kg Battery < 100 kWh Voltage > 900 V Key Values Energy Consumption of an EV Aerodynamics Now, it is not that difficult to understand that aerodynamics can greatly affect the energy consumption of an EV. In fact, that is the reason why the shapes of Formula 1 cars are so distinct. They focus on optimizing the body design to achieve the best aerodynamic efficiency. Essentially, it refers to how efficiently the body of the vehicle is able to cut through wind resulting in the lowest wind resistance. This becomes important with increased speeds. At high speeds. wind resistance poses the greatest hurdle to the acceleration of any vehicle. In the case of the Mercedes VISION EQXX, its body curves and a retractable rear diffuser aid the aerodynamics tremendously. This allows an overall value to be just 0.17 Cd, which will be the best on any production car when it officially launches beating its own kin, the EQS (which has a Cd value of 0.20 currently). Also, there are additional aero-shutters that open up below the front bumper further contributing to the aerodynamic efficiency at high speeds. You might also like: 2023 Hyundai KONA Electric vs 2023 Kia Niro EV – Specs, Range and Price Comparison Energy Consumption of an EV Depends on Wheels You might have noticed that the tyres of most EVs are very specifically designed. While it is an attempt to distinguish EVs from traditional ICE-powered cars, there is a deeper meaning hidden there as well. There is a way of making a car more aerodynamically efficient but that might make less aesthetic and practical sense. For instance, Mercedes says that they could bring the Cd value down to 0.16 if they cover the rear wheels. In fact, we see something like that on the Lightyear 0 solar EV. So, while that might theoretically be possible, EV makers also need to consider the fact that the final product must look like a car for them to actually sell as it might not go down too well with the potential customers for whom the looks and design play a key role. The EQXX has a Crr (Coefficient of Rolling Resistance for Tires of 0.0047). You might also like: Are Chargers at DC Fast Charging Stations Bad For EVs? Rolling Resistance and Weight Now, the total resistance to the motion of any vehicle takes into account the frontal area of the car, its weight, the rolling resistance of the tires, its velocity, air density and acceleration due to gravity. Out of these, automobile designers can vastly control the frontal area and the weight of the car. For this example, the frontal area of the EQXX is 2.12 m2 and its weight is 1,755 kg (3,869 lbs). In comparison, the weight of the EQS is around 2,500 kg. The frontal area of the Telsa Model 3 and Toyota Prius is 2.20 m2. The weight of the battery of the EQXX is just 495 kg compared to 537 kg for the 100 kWh battery of the Tesla Model S. Hence, Mercedes has improved on these aspects without compromising the shape of the vehicle too much. Energy Consumption of an EV Depends on Powertrain and Packaging Finally, energy consumption is a factor of the efficiency of the powertrain. While the aforementioned factors were a part of the design, the efficiency of the powertrain is what engineers are most engrossed in. That is where the EQXX shines. It has a cell-to-body construction and a passive cooling system for the battery. Note that the motor and inverter have active cooling. Mercedes also says that the powertrain efficiency during highway runs is around 95%. Also, the peak DC charging capacity is limited to 120 kW. Both these figures inform that the battery heating is not a problem which is why the engineers have decided to go with an air-cooled battery system rather than the more common liquid-cooled ones that we see in most cars. Hence, these are the most prominent factors that determine the overall efficiency and energy consumption rate of an EV. Mercedes VISION EQXX is an attempt to showcase just how far we can stretch the boundaries with the existing technology without making too many changes to the general aesthetics of a car. We are certain that more carmakers will pursue this method of making cars more efficient rather than slapping them with large batteries. We would love to hear your opinions about this.

2023 Hyundai KONA Electric vs 2023 Kia Niro EV Comparison

2023 Hyundai KONA Electric vs 2023 Kia Niro EV – Specs, Range and Price Comparison

This post covers the comparison of the 2023 versions of the Hyundai KONA Electric and Kia Niro EV. Now, both these EVs are already established products across various international markets. These are converted models from ICE to electric. That helps keep the costs down compared to a fully electric car based on a dedicated electric platform. Each costing under $40,000 USD, we shall glance through the similarities and differences between the two. You might also like: Hyundai IONIQ 6 vs Kia EV6 – Specs, Price Comparison 2023 Hyundai KONA Electric vs 2023 Kia Niro EV – Specs Comparison In terms of powertrains, the KONA electric comes with a 64 kWh Lithium-ion polymer battery pack that powers an electric motor sending power to the front wheels. The total system output is a decent 201 hp and 290 lb-ft (393 Nm). It has a range of 258 miles (415 km) and charging to 80% using a 100 kW DC fast charger takes 47 mins. Acceleration from 0-62 mph (0-100 km/h) takes 6.4 secs. On the other hand, the Niro EV comes powered by a 64.8 kWh Lithium-ion polymer battery that also powers the front wheels via an electric motor. The power and torque stand at 201 hp and 188 lb-ft (255 Nm) respectively. The driving range is 253 miles (407 km) and Level 3 DC fast charging takes 43 mins to get charged (up to 80%). Acceleration from 0-62 mph (0-100 km/h) takes 7.1 secs. Specs Comparison KONA Electric Niro EV Drivetrain FWD FWD Battery 64 kWh 64.8 kWh Range 258 mi (415 km) 253 mi (407 km) Power 201 hp 201 hp Torque 290 lb-ft (393 Nm) 188 lb-ft (255 Nm) DC Fast Charging 47 mins (10-80%) 43 mins (10-80%) Acceleration (0-62 mph / 100 km/h) 6.4 secs 7.1 secs Specs Comparison You might also like: Cupra Born vs VW ID.3 – Which One Should You Pick? Dimensions Comparison When it comes to dimensions, the Niro EV has a significant advantage over the KONA Electric. The former is 4,420 mm long, 1,825 mm wide, 1,570 mm high and has a wheelbase of 2,720 mm. On the other hand, the KONA Electric is 4,205 mm long, 1,800 mm wide, 1,570 mm high and has a wheelbase of 2,600 mm. Dimensions Niro EV KONA Electric Length 4,420 mm 4,205 mm Width 1,825 mm 1,800 mm Height 1,570 mm 1,570 mm Wheelbase 2,720 mm 2,600 mm Boot Capacity 651 litres 544 litres Dimensions Comparison You might also like: 2023 Kia Niro EV Wind vs Wave – Price & Features Comparison Price Comparison The 2023 Hyundai KONA Electric is the more affordable of the two with the base variant starting at $33,550 USD while the starting price of the 2023 Kia Niro EV is $39,450 USD. The $5,900 price difference gets you more of a car in terms of dimensions, boot capacity and road presence.

Hyundai IONIQ 6 vs Kia EV6 Comparison

Hyundai IONIQ 6 vs Kia EV6 – Specs, Price Comparison

Hyundai Motor Group is on a mission to establish itself as a prominent player in this transition phase from traditional ICE-powered vehicles to EVs and has already grabbed a solid lead with its products. In this blog post, we shall do a Hyundai IONIQ 6 vs Kia EV6 comparison in terms of specs and price. Both these EVs, essentially, come from the same parent company, Hyundai Motor Group. While the IONIQ is an all-electric sub-brand of Hyundai, Kia is its sister organization too. Launched on July 12, 2022, Hyundai IONIQ 6 has become a huge success in the international market. Its production takes place in South Korea at the Asan plant. The production of the Hyundai IONIQ 6 for the USA market will start in January 2023 and its sales will commence in March 2023. You might also like: Cupra Born vs VW ID.3 – Which One Should You Pick? Hyundai IONIQ 6 vs Kia EV6 – Specs Comparison Before we begin, it must be noted that the IONIQ 6 has only been announced in the dual-motor AWD configuration with the larger 77.4 kWh battery pack. The single-motor variant with a smaller battery (53 kWh) will be launched in the coming months. Therefore, we shall compare it to the top trim of the Kia EV6 only. Both these EVs are based on Hyundai’s E-GMP (Electric Global Modular Platform). Specs Comparison Hyundai IONIQ 6 Kia EV6 Drivetrain 2WD/AWD 2WD/AWD Battery 77.4 kWh 77.4 kWh Power 239 kW (320 hp) 239 kW (320 hp) Torque 446 lb-ft (605 Nm) 446 lb-ft (605 Nm) Range 320 miles (515 km) 274 miles (441 km) Acceleration (0-60 mph) 5.1 secs 5.1 secs 350 kW DC Fast Charging – 800 V (10%-80%) 20 mins 18 mins Drag Coeff. 0.21 0.28 Hyundai IONIQ 6 vs Kia EV6 – Specs Comparison While these two will feature identical powertrains, the difference lies in their body types. Whereas the EV6 is a crossover SUV, the IONIQ 6 is an aerodynamically sound electric sedan that Hyundai calls an “Electric Streamliner”. The sheer design will alter the range and efficiency of the IONIQ 6. Therefore, you will be able to squeeze more out of the electric sedan compared to the electric crossover. The extended-range version will be launched later that will have a range of up to 382 miles (615 km). You might also like: Kia EV6 Light vs Wind vs GT-Line – Specs and Price Comparison Hyundai IONIQ 6 vs Kia EV6 – Price Comparison The prices of the Kia EV6 range from $47,000 USD to $58,500 USD for the 2023 model. On the other hand, the estimated prices of the Hyundai IONIQ 6 would lie somewhere between $45,000 USD to $55,000 USD. Hence, there isn’t much to choose between the two in terms of prices. Price Comparison Kia EV6 Hyundai IONIQ 6 Base Trim $47,000 $45,000 (est.) Top Trim $58,500 $55,000 (est.) Hyundai IONIQ 6 vs Kia EV6 – Price Comparison Verdict With the price constraints out of the way, it really boils down to the kind of body one prefers. There lies a clear distinction between the two. If you are someone who loves the rather imposing SUV-ish road presence, the EV6 might do the trick. On the other hand, if you want something a bit more unique with an understated and sophisticated design, the IONIQ 6 electric sedan might make more sense.

cupra born vs vw id.3 comparison

Cupra Born vs VW ID.3 – Which One Should You Pick?

The compact electric crossover segment is getting heated up and these two are quite prominent products which is why we compare the two in terms of specs, dimensions, prices and features. The Cupra Born and VW ID.3 are excellent options for all those looking for a compact city-friendly electric crossover. They have a distinct style, practicality and affordability in addition to being feature-laden and environment-supportive. Cupra is the performance division of SEAT, while ID represents the future-oriented electric nameplate from Volkswagen. But it must be mentioned here that Volkswagen Group owns Cupra. Let us compare these two to determine which one suits you the best. You might also like: Leapmotor C11 Electric SUV Specs, Range, Price & More! You might also like: 2022 Porsche Taycan – Price, Variants, Specs, Range, & More Cupra Born vs VW ID.3 – Specs Comparison Interestingly, both these are quite similar in terms of specs which makes things very interesting indeed. Born is a bit varied when it comes to powertrain options and also has a bigger battery pack option which offers significantly more range than the ID.3. Note that the Cupra Born comes in two variants – Born and Born e-Boost. As for ID.3, currently, only the Life variant is available in the UK. Specs Comparison Cupra Born VW ID.3 Battery 58 & 77 kWh 58 kWh Range 343 mi (552 km) [w/ 77 kWh] 265 mi (426 km) Power / Torque 231 hp / 310 Nm 200 hp / 310 Nm Acceleration (0-100 km/h) 6.6 secs [w/ 58 kWh] 7.3 secs Charging (DC Fast) 30 mins up to 80% in 30 mins Euro NCAP 5 Star 5 Star Cupra Born vs VW ID.3 Specs Comparison You might also like: Canoo Electric Pickup Truck Could Be The EV You Really Need Cupra Born vs VW ID.3 – Dimensions Comparison Being urban electric crossovers/hatchbacks, both these EVs have comparable sizes. As seen from the table below, the Cupra is longer than the VW but the wheelbase (space inside the cabin) is quite identical. Incidentally, both have the exact same boot space. Dimensions Cupra Born VW ID.3 Length 4,324 mm 4,261 mm Width 2,070 mm (w/ mirrors) 1,809 mm (w/o mirrors) Height 1,540 mm 1,568 mm Wheelbase 2,766 mm 2,770 mm Boot Space 385 litres 385 litres Dimensions Comparison Price Comparison The main reason for comparing these two EVs is the proximity of their prices. That is what makes the decision a bit confusing for a whole bunch of people. The Born starts at £34,715 (on the road). On the other hand, ID.3 starts at £36,195 (on the road). Price Cupra Born VW ID.3 Starting at £34,715 £36,195 All prices on the road You might also like: VinFast VF8 Will Be The First EV From Vietnam Features Comparison The Cupra Born comes with features like a 12-inch Floating Infotainment Display, a 5.3-inch Digital Cockpit Display, Panoramic Sunroof, Bucket Seats at the rear, e-Boost Mode, 20-inch Alloys, Cupra Connect Gen 4 App, Navigation System, Augmented Reality Heads Up Display, 360-degree Camera, ADAS Functions, Wireless Smartphone Connectivity and Charging, Recycled Materials used inside the cabin, Premium Beats Audio System, Voice Recognition, 12-way Electrically Adjustable Front Seats with Lumbar Support and Massage Function, LTE Connectivity, and much more. On the other hand, the ID.3 is equally impressive with functions like a 10-inch Infotainment Display, Bluetooth, Wireless Charging, Panoramic Sunroof, Augmented Reality Heads Up Display, Premium Audio System, Predictive Navigation, Voice Assistant, 30-coloured Ambient Lighting, Heated Steering Wheel, Height Adjustable Front Seats, Car2X Vehicle Networking, e-SIM Connectivity, Rear View Camera, Front and Rear Parking Sensors, Adaptive Cruise Control and more.

Problems with Tesla EV Charging Stations

What Are The Problems With EV Charging Stations?

EV charging stations are being installed at a rapid pace across the country but it doesn’t come without its problems and challenges. Electric cars seem to be the inevitable mobility trend that this generation is heading toward but the problems and issues associated with the EV charging stations pose a huge hurdle to reaching that point. While most of us are aware of the general challenges of the industry like high initial costs, charging times and range anxiety, the real focus needs to be on developing the charging infrastructure. That, alone, is the most arduous task that has the potential to dispel other issues and propel mass adoption. You might also like: Can Electric Car Batteries Be Replaced or Swapped? EV Charging Stations In The U.S. When you think about it, the challenges related to the EVs costing almost at par with the standard internal combustion engine cars (around $35,000) and offering a decent range of around (300 miles on a single charge) are somewhat remedied, but the comparison of the number of gas stations (150,000) and EV charging stations (46,000) is what is still far away at this point in time. Even worse, out of these 46,000, less than 10,000 charging stations have the capabilities to charge any EV irrespective of make or model. Also, the total number of DC Fast charging stations in the U.S. hovers around just 6,000. You might also like: 2022 Polestar 2 Electric Car – Range, Interior & Specs Companies Offering EV Charging Stations There are primarily 4 key players in the space, ChargePoint, Tesla, Electrify America and EVgo. EV Charging Companies ChargePoint Tesla Electrify America EVgo Others Total Charging Stations 30,000 6,000 800 850 8,000 Fast Charging Stations 1,700 1,300 750 840 ~1,400 EV Charging Station Companies Now, the Tesla Supercharging Stations have a maximum of 250 kW charging which amounts to about 200 miles of charge in around 15 minutes. However, it must be noted that the EVs from other carmakers are not equipped to be charged at these stations as this is a Tesla-exclusive affair. The other end of the spectrum is that not all vehicles come with the feature of fast charging or compatibility with every charging socket (Tesla Supercharger, J1772, CHAdeMO, CCS). That is what narrows the possibilities of any EV being able to charge at any charging stations across the country significantly. Therefore, the effective number of charging stations where every kind of electric vehicle could be charged is under 10,000. There lies the biggest hurdle in terms of infrastructure. You might also like: Tesla Battery (4680) vs BYD Blade Battery – Comparison EV Charging Infrastrucutre Cost According to some estimates by industry experts, a regular Tesla Supercharging Station with 6-8 stalls delivering 120 kW to 150 kW each would cost roughly $250,000 to build. On the other hand, Volkswagen-owned Electrify America charging stations with similar specs would cost around $350,000. There lies the biggest problem with the EV charging stations. One can’t simply build these overnight, or even in a couple of years. And until this aspect is sorted, improving the range and bringing down the cost of EVs isn’t gonna achieve much in terms of mass adoption, although the EV makers will achieve that nevertheless. This is because we are at the point where the cost and range have become somewhat decent and accepted by the general public. It is the anxiety caused by not knowing where the next charging station is, that is preventing people from going for an EV. That is where the government support is needed the most as this job is too herculean for any single company. It could offer incentives to players to develop the charging infrastructure just like offering incentives to the people to buy EVs. You might also like: What Is Vehicle To Load (V2L) & Which EVs Have This Feature? Correct Way of Charging EVs Another relevant aspect of EV charging is the fact that the battery of a car (or any other electronic gadget) charges fast at the beginning (typically up to 50%) but requires significant time for the other half. Hence, people must try to charge their batteries up to 50% at one stop, drive and then make another stop to charge for 50% again, while on the highway. Overall, this will save them more time compared to when they charge the EV until 100% at one charging station. These are some habits that EV owners need to inculcate in order to squeeze the maximum range and spend minimum time at the charging station. However, for this, again, plenty of infrastructure is needed so that people quit the anxiety about finding the next charging station.

Hybrid vs Electric Cars

Hybrid Cars vs Electric Cars – Which Is Better and Why?

The path to the future clearly leads to electric cars but must pass through hybrid cars. The obvious question that a modern-day car buyer must consider before making a purchase decision is hybrid vs electric cars. In essence, anyone who wants to own a vehicle for a long time would consider some sort of electrification. There are only two valid choices; a full-electric car or a hybrid electric car. Let us discuss the pros and cons of each. You might also like: Electric Car vs Gas Car – Why To Upgrade? Electric Cars vs Hybrid Cars Hybrid Cars – Pros and Cons The hybrid cars that we are talking about here are PHEVs (Plug-In Hybrid Cars) that are capable of driving on pure electricity for short distances. The mild-hybrid cars are those that offer just the Start/Stop function. The PHEVs are cleverly integrated into modern vehicles which allows the vehicle to be driven using an electric motor. In addition to that, hybrid powertrains also aid the engine by providing some form of boost or enhancing the fuel economy. This is done by providing power to the engine during those RPMs when the internal combustion engine consumes the most fuel. The electric system comes in handy to increase the mileage of cars significantly. Another important aspect of hybrid vehicles is the fact that it doesn’t require too many modifications to the engine of a regular car. There are not too many electric components to disturb the regular layout of the IC engine. Finally, the prices of hybrid cars are much more affordable and attractive compared to pure electric cars. This translates to a minimal increment over the regular IC engine-powered vehicles. Since, price is a major hurdle in the mass adoption process of the EVs, hybrid vehicles present a great case. You might also like: Are Electric Car Chargers Universal – Types of Chargers Electric Cars – Pros and Cons The full-electric cars have a slew of advantages which is why the prospect is gaining traction so rapidly. The running costs compared to fuel-powered vehicles are drastically low. In fact, the prices of petrol and diesel are on a rise lately and this trend is unlikely to stop anytime soon. The price to charge the EV is comparatively much cheaper. Apart from that, there are no tailpipe emissions at all. This is a great feature to have in big cities where governments around the globe are looking for such solutions. However, it must be argued that the carbon footprint for EVs is not zero because the production of batteries and electricity is not carbon-free yet. The driving dynamics and performance of electric cars are yet another reason why people are so in awe of them. Unlike IC engines, the electric powertrains offer 100% torque from the get-go. As soon as you press the accelerator pedal, there is no lag in power delivery. This is because there are not too many mechanical components or emission-focused engine calibration to prevent the engine from delivering all the torque to the wheels instantly. The list of cons of EVs is, unfortunately, quite lengthy too. First and foremost, the initial costs of EVs are almost double that of a similar model with an IC engine. This puts the EVs far away from the reach of most regular car buyers. On top of that, the biggest concern is the lack of charging infrastructure. People have the range anxiety that they haven’t gotten over yet. You might also like: Are Hybrid Powertrains Perfect To Bridge The Gap Between IC Engines & Full-Electric Drivetrains? Once the EV runs out of juice on the highway, you are pretty much stranded. Although the charging infrastructure is being developed at a rapid pace, it would still take years before there are enough charging stations on the highways to make people comfortable and relaxed.

Edison Future Cybertruck Competitor

Is Edison Future (EF1-T) A Worthy Competitor To Tesla Cybertruck

With the Tesla Cybertruck creating a ton of buzz around it for the longest time, could something like the Edison Future (EF1-T) electric truck prove to be a worthy competitor? The EV enthusiasts must’ve heard about the gigantic Tesla Cybertruck that was unveiled in 2019 but have you heard about the Edison Future (EF1-T), a potential competitor? Although these electric trucks still haven’t made it to the streets, the buzz around them is immense. There aren’t too many direct rivals to the Cybertruck barring the Ford F-150 Lightning and Chevy Silverado EV.  While these are the EVs from the traditional carmakers, there is a worthy new player wanting to dominate the segment as well. Yes, we are talking about Edison Future, EF1-T which was showcased at the 2021 LA Motor Show as a concept. It is a unique EV truck that will be powered by solar energy.  You might also like: 2022 BMW i4 eDrive40 vs M50 – Specs, Range & Performance Comparison Edison Future vs Tesla Cybertruck – Exterior Comparison The EF1-T could be configured according to the preference of its owners. It could be used as a traditional truck with a cargo compartment at the rear with the solar panels integrated on the retractable roof that could be used to close the rear down making it look like the Cybertruck. The boxy silhouette, sharp creases, sleek use of LED strips at the front and rear, cameras instead of side mirrors, flush-fitting door handles, retractable side steps for easier ingress and egress, massive high-profile tires, and a rugged rectangular design at the rear are some of the key exterior characteristics of the EF1-T.  On the other hand, the Tesla Cybertruck has been showcased on multiple occasions and features the absolute boxy design straight out of a sci-fi movie, with LED strip running the width of the front fascia, raked side pillars, cameras instead of the side view mirrors, chunky wheel arches, high-profile tires, steeply sloping tail end, the entire exterior design language devoid of any curves. The road presence of both these EV trucks would be a major pull for a ton of buyers.  Interior Comparison On the inside of the concept EF1-T, the layout is quite uncluttered with a massive 17.5-inch free-floating infotainment display taking the centre stage, a unique 3 seat layout at the front, minimalistic dashboard design, pillar mounted 7-inch display screens as rear-view mirrors, roof-mounted LED reading and cabin lamps, unique solar mosaic panel to charge the batteries, generous use of aluminium to enhance the premium quotient inside the cabin and all the latest connectivity and convenience features.  The interior of the Tesla Cybertruck is in line with the minimalist design philosophy of the EV maker that we have seen on other Tesla products as well. The steering wheel itself is a compact rectangular unit giving you the feeling of operating something truly futuristic, the dashboard features a sharp crease at the centre that runs across the width of the cabin, and the AC vents are completely hidden from the view giving the impression of a clean and sophisticated dashboard, the door panels and seats are suave with angular textures and no curves, just like on the outside. It boasts of all the modern features like a humungous touchscreen infotainment system with all the controls for multimedia, connectivity, climate control, drive information, etc.  You might also like: 2022 Ford Mustang Mach E – Range, Specs, Models, Prices Specs Comparison The EF1-T comes in three variants, Standard, Super and Premium with a single, dual and triple motor setups respectively. The single motor version has a range of 300 miles (EPA-estimated) and a 0-60 mph acceleration time of just 6.5 secs. The towing capacity is a handy 7500 lbs.  The dual-motor version has a 450 miles of range (EPA-estimated) and a mere 3.9 secs of 0-60 mph sprint time. It developed a massive 600 hp and has a towing capacity of 11,000 lbs.  The triple-motor all-wheel-drive variant makes 700 hp and has an EPA-estimated range of 380 miles. The towing capacity stands at 9000 lbs. All these variants are capable of solar charging that could a little extra juice to the batteries on bright sunny days.  You might also like: 2022 Kia EV6 Light vs Wind vs GT-Line – Specs and Price Comparison Edison Future (EF1-T) Single Motor Dual-Motor Triple-Motor Power (hp) 470 600 700 Range (miles) 300 450 380 Towing Capacity (lbs) 7500 11000 9000 Acceleration (0-60 mph) 6.5 secs 4.5 secs 3.9 secs The Tesla Cybertruck will also come with the similar 3 variants with single, dual and triple motor setups. However, a quad-motor configuration might be on the cards for later. The single motor EV will have an EPA-estimated range of 250 miles with a 0-60 mph time of 6.5 secs.  The dual-motor powertrain will have over 300 miles of range and 4.5 secs of 0-60 mph powering all four wheels. The triple motor all-wheel-drive configuration will feature over 500 miles of range and a claimed 0-60 mph of just 2.9 secs and a top speed of 130 mph. Tesla Cybertruck Single Motor Dual-Motor Triple-Motor Power (hp) (Expected) 400 690 794 Range (miles) 250 300 500 Towing Capacity (lbs) 7500 10000 14000 Acceleration (0-60 mph) 6.5 secs 4.5 secs 2.9 secs Launch Date While the Tesla Cybertruck is slated to launch in 2023, the EF1-T might see the light of day sometime around 2025. Do you agree that the Edison Future (EF1-T) electric truck could prove to be the ideal competitor to the Tesla Cybertruck once these are launched?

Electric vs Gas Car

Electric Car vs Gas Car – Why To Upgrade?

With people beginning to experience the electric car revolution around them, the natural question is a comparison with the traditional gas cars. The electric car vs gas car debate comes naturally if you are even remotely privy to the latest developments around yourself in the global automobile industry. Electric cars are here and for good. There is almost nothing left in the development of an internal combustion engine to make them comply with the ever-stringent becoming emission regulations in every part of the world. The future, that people used to associate electric cars with, is here. Are you ready to upgrade? You might also like: Are Electric Car Chargers Universal – Types of Chargers Electric vs Gas Cars Gas cars have been around for over a century. The steam engine and later on, fuel in the form of petrol and diesel were the sources for generating power in gas cars. Electric cars, on the contrary, receive power from a battery that is generally placed under the floor of the vehicle. It supplied power to the electric motor, in turn powering the wheels. This is the basic difference of how the power is generated in both these types of cars.  Emissions Difference The traditional fuels are derived from natural resources where petrol and diesel burn to produce energy. This leaves a large chunk of carbon in the form of exhaust emissions. Internal combustion engines (ICE) are only around 25-30% (petrol) and 30-40% (diesel) efficient. This naturally means that the majority of the energy produced by ICE-power cars goes waste and causes pollution. To tackle this, electrification was introduced.  With electric vehicles, there is no fuel involved and no emissions. However, it must be understood that the carbon emissions required to produce electricity and batteries need to be taken into consideration which is referred to as source-to-tank. There are emissions involved in this process. But at the end of the day, companies are working on developing recyclable battery packs with less use of toxic metals in the composition of cells. Also, electricity is being produced by renewable sources like windmills, solar energy and hydro energy.  You might also like: Is Electric Car Battery Safe, Fireproof, Waterproof and Short Circuit Proof? Price Difference  While the technological feasibility is for the OEMs to take care of, the cost of the final product is what the regal people are concerned with. All zero-emissions narratives and carbon neutrality targets mean nothing if people are not able to afford electric cars. In this aspect, the EV version of a regular car costs around over 50% more for the same car model. This is a huge mark-up for the customers to bear.  As with every technology, the costs associated with it come down when the volumes go up. As far as the EV space is concerned, we are still at a relatively nascent stage. There needs to be a lot of work done to improve battery manufacturing and capacity, charging infrastructure, EV manufacturing costs, etc. for electrified cars to become a mass market. But the governments across the world are offering incentives and benefits to promote EV adoption. On the other end of the spectrum, the auto manufacturers have come up with aggressive and ambitious plans to quit manufacturing ICE-powered vehicles by the end of the decade. Hence, you must get ready to embrace this EV wave that seems to be inevitable. These are some points to be considered in this electric car vs gas car debate.

Types of Electric Car Chargers

Are Electric Car Chargers Universal – Types of Chargers

The common query among the potential electric car buyers is what are the types of chargers and whether or not they are universal.  This article explains, in detail, the types of electric car chargers and a whether or not they are universal in their application. Electric cars are all the buzz at the moment. Every major traditional carmaker is amidst the transition from internal combustion engines to electric powertrains while there are a plethora of new players/startups emerging in the space that are born electric. Within this decade, we are likely to witness a historic and almost complete metamorphosis into environment-friendly mobility solutions.  You might also like: Is Electric Car Battery Safe, Fireproof, Waterproof and Short Circuit Proof? These electric cars will use various kinds of chargers depending on the kind of segment they lie in. Here are the types of chargers and their plugs that are found in major EVs. Types of Electric Car Chargers Level 1 (120V – AC Charging) – This is the basic charging infrastructure that everyone has in their homes. This simple AC charging method takes the longest time since the AC power gets converted into DC power first. The charging capacity for such kinds of chargers could be upto 3 kW. It will take the longest (upto 15 hours or even more) to charge your electric car. Typical applications include home charging overnight.  Level 2 (240V – AC Charging) – Most of the public charging stations have this setup where the charging capacity could be as high as around 7 kW. Many EVs above the entry-level segment come with onboard 7 kW charging equipment. Such setups could be found in parking lots of big companies, public charging stations, etc. Level 3 (upto 480V – DC Fast/Rapid Charging) – Modern mid-to-high-end electric cars come with the option of DC fast charging that supports upto 350 kW capacity. Such kind of setup typically charges the batteries of vehicles in mere minutes. However, the hardware required for this must be bought separately. Many new car companies are working on an 800V charging infrastructure as well.  Type of Charger Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Architecture up to 120 V up to 240 V up to 800 V Capacity up to 3 kW up to 7 kW up to 350 kW Most Common Location Home Parking Lots (Public) Public Charging Stations Types of Plugs Equally relevant to the charging equipment are the types of plugs used in electric cars. Here are the types of plugs compatible with various chargers.  Type 1 Plug – Most of the 3-pin sockets (single-phase) that are found in homes across various countries of the world refer to as Type 1 plugs. These support the Level 1 and Level 2 chargers with a capacity of upto 7 kW.  Type 2 Plug – The three-phase plugs are found in the charging equipment that has charging capacities of around 40 kW in public places. Domestic usage of around 22 kW charging capacity is also supported by these Type 2 plugs. Most of the EVs of the world used either Type 1 or Type 2 plugs only.  Type 3 Plug – Now, there are a couple of plugs that fall under this category and are used in DC fast charging scenarios. The most common and increasingly used Type 3 plug is the CCS (Combined Charging System) that has combines the 2-pin plug with the standard 3-pin plug. The 5-pin setup allows for the rapid charging of upto 170 kW.  The other not-so-common CHAdeMO type of plugs have a 10-pin setup but are only used by a handful of brands like Nissan and Mitsubishi.  While the chargers of electric cars are generally universal, the plugs used for DC fast charging could be manufacturer-specific.